"The History of Diablo" is a great 15 minute video giving some details about the history of Diablo in time for Diablo IV's release. I think it's a must-see for Diablo fans.
Let me know what you think about it and if you're getting into Diablo IV today.
"The History of Diablo" is a great 15 minute video giving some details about the history of Diablo in time for Diablo IV's release. I think it's a must-see for Diablo fans.
Let me know what you think about it and if you're getting into Diablo IV today.
Microsoft is acquiring Activision for 69 billion, Take Two acquired Zynga for 13 billion and just today word broke that Sony acquired Bungie for 4 billion. I'm not sure how I would have guessed 2020 would start but it wouldn't be with some of the biggest tech acquisitions.
I can't really speak for Take Two, but generally speaking I don't mind these acquisitions as I'm hopeful Microsoft would do well with Activision/Blizzard and I'm not sure there would be much of a change with Sony acquiring Bungie beyond us getting more games from them. With that, consolidating all of the main game franchises in a handful of companies isn't great and I wonder how long multi-platform... Read All
Microsoft is acquiring Activision for 69 billion, Take Two acquired Zynga for 13 billion and just today word broke that Sony acquired Bungie for 4 billion. I'm not sure how I would have guessed 2020 would start but it wouldn't be with some of the biggest tech acquisitions.
I can't really speak for Take Two, but generally speaking I don't mind these acquisitions as I'm hopeful Microsoft would do well with Activision/Blizzard and I'm not sure there would be much of a change with Sony acquiring Bungie beyond us getting more games from them. With that, consolidating all of the main game franchises in a handful of companies isn't great and I wonder how long multi-platform gaming will last? It used to be that the majority of releases were multi-platform but it seems those days are sadly numbered.
Azurephile Super Member
wrote on 02/01/2022 at 04:33am
I read about this weeks or a month or so ago. I'm actually a quite optimistic about this simply because of the toxic news we've heard from Activision/Blizzard. I'm extremely confident that Microsoft will provide a much better corporate environment for employees. I think that makes this acquisition much more favorable. I think by acquiring Mojang it helped give Minecraft a huge boost, so I'm hoping to see that happen w/ our favorite Blizzard games.
Yeah at this point Iâm kinda optimistic for any change with Activistion/Blizzard but I really hope they donât start excluding PlayStation and Switch with those games. I mean Call if Duty alone is such a huge franchise, if they eventually stop releasing that for PlayStation itâs a huge deep cut to their players.
It seems more and more like weâre working toward two massive game publisher conglomerates⌠with Nintendo over there just doing their thing
If you want to join this conversation you need to sign in.
Well, I did not see this coming, but the original Diablo is up for sale over at GoG.com, DRM free! I missed Diablo during it's first run, is it worth looking into now?
Edit: It appears there are two versions available through GoG.
"Travelers looking for the authentic Diablo experience can play the game as it was in 1996, with period-appropriate 20 FPS SVGA graphics, and the ability to matchmaker through the classic version of Blizzardâs Battle.net online-gaming service. For those wanting something a bit more modern, Blizzard and GOG.COM have collaborated on an updated version of the game tuned for todayâs gaming PCs, which includes out-of-the-box Windows 10 compatibility,... Read All
Well, I did not see this coming, but the original Diablo is up for sale over at GoG.com, DRM free! I missed Diablo during it's first run, is it worth looking into now?
Edit: It appears there are two versions available through GoG.
"Travelers looking for the authentic Diablo experience can play the game as it was in 1996, with period-appropriate 20 FPS SVGA graphics, and the ability to matchmaker through the classic version of Blizzardâs Battle.netÂŽ online-gaming service. For those wanting something a bit more modern, Blizzard and GOG.COM have collaborated on an updated version of the game tuned for todayâs gaming PCs, which includes out-of-the-box Windows 10 compatibility, a host of bug fixes and high-resolution support." https://www.gog.com/game/diablo
"I missed Diablo during it's first run, is it worth looking into now?"
I'm going to answer this with another question. Did you play Diablo 2? If you haven't then I'd say skip Diablo and when the Diablo 2 remake comes out, get that.
Two reasons.
1. You move painfully slow in the original Diablo. It wasn't a problem at the time because Diablo was such a unique and fresh game but compared to anything more modern the movement speed is painful for many. 2. Diablo 2 improves on it in nearly every way and the remake will come out in the next couple years.
If you want to play a slice of gaming history OR you played Diablo a ton and want to relive it then i'd say it's an easy pickup. For me, Diablo is a classically incredible game and the $10 price tag is very cheap but certain aspects of it might not make for the most smooth play through. I never owned the original but had the demo and I played the HELL of out that demo.
Diablo sets a great dark tone and because you move so slowly the dread of having monsters swarm your is felt when you are caught off-guard.
Good news everybody, Battle.net is back and it's... the same?
Back in September Blizzard announced that it's Battle.net online game service would be called "Blizzard." It was an interesting idea but one that was a bit sad and strange because they didn't seem to consistently stick with it. That and most people still called it Battle.net. Well it seems Blizzard is heading back to calling Battle.net Battle.net and I think that's a really good idea.
"Battle.net is the central nervous system for Blizzard games and the connective tissue that has brought Blizzard players together since 1996. The technology was never going away, but after giving the branding change further... Read All
Good news everybody, Battle.net is back and it's... the same?
Back in September Blizzard announced that it's Battle.net online game service would be called "Blizzard." It was an interesting idea but one that was a bit sad and strange because they didn't seem to consistently stick with it. That and most people still called it Battle.net. Well it seems Blizzard is heading back to calling Battle.net Battle.net and I think that's a really good idea.
"Battle.net is the central nervous system for Blizzard games and the connective tissue that has brought Blizzard players together since 1996. The technology was never going away, but after giving the branding change further consideration and also hearing your feedback, weâre in agreement that the name should stay as well. Take it from the developer formerly known as Silicon & Synapse, and Chaos Studios, names are important too.
Moving forward, to help offset some of the original concerns we listed back in September, we will be connecting âBlizzardâ to âBattle.netâ in our logo for the service and in general when we refer to it in print: Blizzard Battle.net."
I'm not one to decry change but when something is so ingrained into gaming culture as battle.net, it's hard to change it. I'm glad they changed their minds.
jdodson Admin Post Author
wrote on 08/18/2017 at 01:22pm
Yeah, I agree. Battle.net has been and is really important. And it's also free.
If you want to join this conversation you need to sign in.
I just watched a very impressive Diablo Summer Games Done Quick 2016 run by Funkmastermp where he blows through the game in 20 minutes. This is pretty impressive considering the very slow character run speed in the original Diablo and that Funmastermp never gets his character over level 3. Funkmastermp uses a frame timed item dupe to get a ton of gold to buy enough mana potions and items. At one point he needs to get a teleport scroll tome and has to talk to reload the game and talk to Adria over 50 times.
This is a really good run and if you are a fan of Diablo something you should watch.
I just watched a very impressive Diablo Summer Games Done Quick 2016 run by Funkmastermp where he blows through the game in 20 minutes. This is pretty impressive considering the very slow character run speed in the original Diablo and that Funmastermp never gets his character over level 3. Funkmastermp uses a frame timed item dupe to get a ton of gold to buy enough mana potions and items. At one point he needs to get a teleport scroll tome and has to talk to reload the game and talk to Adria over 50 times.
This is a really good run and if you are a fan of Diablo something you should watch.
After Diablo became a huge success on PC, Blizzard partnered with EA to port it to the original Playstation. This bit of retro knowledge wasn't something I was aware of until I saw RetroSnow's recent review of Playstation Diablo. From his review, the port seems to be very well done if not a bit dark in certain levels. It's nice to see Diablo III make a strong comeback on modern consoles and if you have a PS3, PS4, 360 or XBone I seriously recommend you download the Diablo III demo to see how well it plays.
After Diablo became a huge success on PC, Blizzard partnered with EA to port it to the original Playstation. This bit of retro knowledge wasn't something I was aware of until I saw RetroSnow's recent review of Playstation Diablo. From his review, the port seems to be very well done if not a bit dark in certain levels. It's nice to see Diablo III make a strong comeback on modern consoles and if you have a PS3, PS4, 360 or XBone I seriously recommend you download the Diablo III demo to see how well it plays.
I have Diablo III for PS4, and I almost hate to say it (almost), but I think I prefer it there than on PC. Of course, Diablo is much better suited for console play than some of their other games, but even then, they did an amazing job with the console builds (for the PS4, at least).
Azurephile Super Member
wrote on 07/05/2016 at 01:04am
I'm relatively a newb when it comes to Diablo, I didn't start playing until the third game. That said, I was surprised to hear familiar music and see Tristram in this video. I really enjoyed Diablo III, which makes it a tempting game to get on a console. I'm glad that it does well on there and that Scrypt amazingly says he thinks he prefers it on the PS4 instead of the PC. Wow!
Yeah they use some of the same themes throughout the series. The Tristram you see in this game is the destroyed Tristram thats a little outside of New Tristram in Diablo III. I *think* some events at the end of the first Diablo destroyed it, but it may have been something that happens off-screen between the first and second games. I honestly don't remember.
Yeah, the playstation version was pretty fun, but not quite as good as the pc... for Diablo 3, I really like the console version especially the local multiplayer and the dodge roll mechanic
jdodson Admin Post Author
wrote on 07/10/2016 at 04:10am
Yeah, up until loot 2.0 and Reaper of Souls on PC I thought the console game was __WAY__ better but then the PC got most of the updates exception the dodge roll. That said, the console port is pretty darn good and the ability to couch co-op is pretty awesome.
If you want to join this conversation you need to sign in.
If you've tried to play the original Diablo on a modern PC you know how tricky it can be. Even if you get it working for one area, moving to the next can throw all kinds of graphical problems, and modern resolutions just make it look wacky. That's a technical term, by the way.
Since it seems Blizzard has (reasonably) long abandoned this game, we've been basically out of luck, but if a new project called Freeablo comes to fruition, we'll get to play the game in ways we never imagined back when it first came out, like playing it on Linux or in 2560x1440 resolution: http://wheybags.netsoc.ie/freeablo.png
It's important to note that this is just the engine. You still need... Read All
If you've tried to play the original Diablo on a modern PC you know how tricky it can be. Even if you get it working for one area, moving to the next can throw all kinds of graphical problems, and modern resolutions just make it look wacky. That's a technical term, by the way.
Since it seems Blizzard has (reasonably) long abandoned this game, we've been basically out of luck, but if a new project called Freeablo comes to fruition, we'll get to play the game in ways we never imagined back when it first came out, like playing it on Linux or in 2560x1440 resolution: http://wheybags.netsoc.ie/freeablo.png
It's important to note that this is just the engine. You still need the original game to play.
Wheybags is sharing the source on GitHub, as well as compiled releases. Currently it's in early alpha-- you can do some basic things but it's by no means complete yet. If you have C++ chops and want to help, wheybags is looking for some good developers to contribute.
On the reddit post about the game, wheybags says that he wants this to eventually allow the player to customize everything, and mod support is an important feature.
I think these kinds of projects are some of the most important things in gaming. The original Diablo is a great game and I really dislike "losing" it to time. Making these source projects OR having the parent company release the project as free software means the game can live on forever.
When I get home I want to check this out and build it to see how far along it is.
If you want to join this conversation you need to sign in.