
General Discussion
The place for conversation that doesn't make sense to talk about in any specific game in our list. Think of General Discussion as a "catch all" for conversations about gaming, game culture or anything else worth sharing. The place for conversation that doesn't make sense to talk about in any specific game in our list. Think of General Discussion as a "catch all" for conversations about gaming, game culture or anything else worth sharing.


http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey
To celebrate the awards Borderlands 2 won in 2012 2k is handing out 5 golden keys to everyone. Remember to use your keys as you seem to max out at 10!
http://www.gearboxsoftware.com/community/articles/983/awards-and-celebrations
According to a recent interview with Gabe Newell, some developers are earning as much as 500k per year adding content to the Steam Workshop. This just in, I am considering switching my career to "digital hatter."
... Read All Valve posted that Linux client usage is already at 0.8% where Mac client usage rose to 3.7%. Wonder how these numbers will change as more games are ported to Mac and Linux?
http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey
To celebrate the awards Borderlands 2 won in 2012 2k is handing out 5 golden keys to everyone. Remember to use your keys as you seem to max out at 10!
http://www.gearboxsoftware.com/community/articles/983/awards-and-celebrations
According to a recent interview with Gabe Newell, some developers are earning as much as 500k per year adding content to the Steam Workshop. This just in, I am considering switching my career to "digital hatter."
http://www.develop-online.net/news/42933/Steam-Workshop-devs-making-up-to-500k-a-year
I can't stop watching that gif.
Its awesome.

http://www.theverge.com/2013/1/8/3852144/gabe-newell-interview-steam-box-future-of-gaming
It's an interesting read, and the fact that they're building this platform, this paradigm, that anyone can pull from makes me very happy. Hopefully the fact that anyone can make a Steam "console" doesn't muddy the waters. It's one thing that has held Linux back, the confusing variety, but if Valve can pull this off it may change the way we game in some significant ways. Gabe did an interview with The Verge recently about the Steam console, Steambox, Piston, Bigfoot, whatever you want to call it. Read it here:
http://www.theverge.com/2013/1/8/3852144/gabe-newell-interview-steam-box-future-of-gaming
It's an interesting read, and the fact that they're building this platform, this paradigm, that anyone can pull from makes me very happy. Hopefully the fact that anyone can make a Steam "console" doesn't muddy the waters. It's one thing that has held Linux back, the confusing variety, but if Valve can pull this off it may change the way we game in some significant ways.
Tungsten, looks like quickmeme blocks sharing like that with a transparent gif overlay.
I think as long as the variety exists in the hardware and not the software/UI it shouldn't be an issue. It would basically be following the Android model, which works quite well. In my opinion market competition can only be good in cases like this.
Much better! And I agree! :)
This is a great interview, thanks for posting. I have been reading a lot of "ho hum" and opinions that seem to think this is a mistake Valve is making. I will put some of my chips firmly in the "this will be a game changer" bucket. I know, I should be cynical but I am not, this is what I want, so like Tungsten I am excited.
I'm not going to lie. I hate corporations and consider them my enemy. Google won't charm me and I'll never have both a Coke AND a smile. But I'll say this... Valve totally won me over. I want to have Valve over for dinner and I'd totally watch Valve's dog while their away. I can't envision Valve making a move that is not a sound one. I'm stoked for this and if it were a single company trying to make a Steam box, I'd think, "This won't work" but if you fill the market with options, people will take notice and it will become successful. I'm very excited to see how this all pans out.
"I want to have Valve over for dinner and I'd totally watch Valve's dog while their away."
This was almost poetic. I love it. I'm right there with you, they won me over. I know many felt about Steam in the beginning the way a lot of people feel about Origin now, but they've come around in a major way.
I didn't do much with Steam earlier, not because I thought Valve was evil, but because buying the physical pressed game disc was often cheaper. Now thats really not the case and I jumped pretty far into Valve's ecosystem since.
I like the interview because it wasn't "Hey, look how great our new technology is! You are going to love it!" (I'm looking at you WiiU)
Instead it was: "We are going to give you what you want. If it sucks, we're not making it"
They are a pretty cool company that way. Thinking of customers above anything else is a great way to approach stuff. One could say much about Valve but they really give a shit about doing the right thing by people.
I got a lot of great feedback about Valve in my interview with Zach Barth... now if I can just get around to transcribing it.
You interviewed Zach Barth? You gotta transcribe! That sounds interesting.
+1
Is anyone else running the Steam beta in Linux yet? Steam is the only reason I still have Windows on my laptop and it's a touch disheartening to see some games performing better in Windows 8 than they do in Linux. However, Valve has helped advance the driver support for video cards by working directly with the vendors, so I am confident the kinks will get worked out by the time they release the actual Steambox.
To Microsoft's credit, games perform better for me in Windows 8 than in Windows 7.
But you're right, games don't run as smoothly yet. I haven't tried TF2, and there aren't any other Valve games available yet, but from what they say Left 4 Dead 2 runs better in Linux than in Windows. There are a few things at play here. You have the Linux desktop model which is a bit flawed, drivers that aren't optimal, and developers who are less invested in getting the Linux version up to snuff. It's going to be a bit of a process but having been in the beta for a while I can tell things are getting better, slowly.
But bean, I have one suggestion for you, or rather, one set of suggestions. First, what video card and desktop environment are you using in Linux? There are a few optimizations that can make worlds of difference.
E17 on ArchLinux, Intel HD 3000 (the bare minimum for the beta spec), Core i3, 4GB of RAM I know! It's hardly worth calling it a gaming rig. My desktop, which had MUCH better specs, died and I needed a replacement computer...not just for gaming.
L4D2 isn't yet available in the Linux beta. Sad, because that one runs real well on this hardware in Windows, which is one of the reasons I signed up for the beta. I had an empirical baseline for performance.
I haven't tried TF2 in a couple of weeks and I was running XFCE before switching to the lighter Enlightenment 17. In Windows, framerate is low, but playable. In Linux, not close.
OK well, that negates my advice. Unless there's a way in E17 to turn off desktop compositing when full screen apps are in use. I can't remember if it uses compiz or something else for its compositing. And my other suggestion was a setting in nvidia-settings, so that's worthless as well. I tried! :)
I am running Steam on Linux and opened Tf2 and it seemed fine to me. I have a reasonably powerful Desktop with an Nvidia card. So far, I think the biggest detractor is the lack of available games but over the next bit that should change.
Since I do CG development on Linux I had to run Steam using Wine to chat with people while I was developing. So for my primary use on Linux, which is to talk to other people, it works great :D
I am running it on Linux just for chatting as well. I haven't even bothered with any games because I know it's not going to be ready for some time. I feel like it would be a waste of time to adopt it as a serious platform just yet. For me personally anyhow.
E17 has an option to disable compositing on fullscreen windows. Already taken care of. :) I know that part of it is also my very low-end integrated graphics card. When L4D2 becomes available, I'll give that a shot. Until then, I'm hoping more of the Humble Bundle titles get added. Bastion and Binding of Isaac, to name a couple.
I have yet to actually try the voice chat in Steam but I'm glad to hear that works well!
Hoping for all the Bundle Linux ports to come to Steam for sure! L4D would be awesome and if companies like iD that have Linux ports would submit them would be awesome too. Lots of Linux ports just need to be added to Steam of existing titles.

Not many details as of yet, but I had to share it, because look at it! But some hardware specs for the demo unit are here: http://www.polygon.com/2013/1/7/3849284/piston-valve-steam-box-xi3 Look at that thing. Just look at it.
Not many details as of yet, but I had to share it, because look at it! But some hardware specs for the demo unit are here: http://www.polygon.com/2013/1/7/3849284/piston-valve-steam-box-xi3
Its beautiful. Plus has some really awesome hardware that comes with it. Looks to be on the expensive side now but ... that could come down as the mass produce them?
Regardless, this is awesome news!
There's no way this goes to market at 1k. It would just get laughed at.
I agree. Ill pick one up as soon as I can for anything around $300.
They are saying you can upgrade it easily which is good because when they pulled it apart the video card didn't look all that powerful. I can't see how you can install a card with more juice that isn't made specifically for it though because the form factor is pretty tight. Wait and see I suppose.
I think we are entering a zone where the current tech we have now is ridiculously powerful. I don't mean the PS3 or XBox, you can cram much more power in a smaller device.
But even if it were just a PS3 or perhaps 2X a PS3 it would be beefy enough to play all the games out now plus the games going forward. I think Carmack said in a recent Quakecon that they would make games for the current consoles for another generation or so. I think the current PS3 power scale has some legs on it yet even if it is pretty underpowered by the standard the PC I am using sets. Or my Macbook for that matter.
Sig-- maybe they'll give us one of these.
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/3117g8sD8hL._SL500_SS500_.jpg
Hahahaha, double the RAM with all the style of fire engine red!
Hahaha. You better believe I had one of those. Donkey Kong Country wouldn't run without it!
So, I checked out their website and what they currently sell is not that impressive. They're using older AMD Processors and pretty low end RAM and HDD parts. It is a neat looking product, but like others have said, it is just a really small form factor. I think something like the Intel NUC might be a better starting point for a game content consumption device.
Ah, well then its good others are building versions of this. I imagine the first generation might not be as powerful as it could be. Then again, it doesn't take much to get to the point of the current gen consoles. That said, I would like to see a Steam Box that would do 1080p and do it well for most games.
There are on Ep. 20 so here is the link to that as well:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4-ttvM7bAc
FOR AIUR! Somehow I skipped posting Episode 18, so here it is in all its Cartoon glory.
There are on Ep. 20 so here is the link to that as well:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4-ttvM7bAc
FOR AIUR!

Well. Sort of. On one hand I can pick up a great game on a sale for cheap. On the other hand I have 81 games and the list keeps growing year over year.... Read All It started about a few years ago. I bought my first Humble Bundle and linked it to my Steam Account that contained Half Life 2 & Counterstrike. I then bought Portal 2 on PS3 and got a free Steam copy. After that I bought my first Steam game, The Binding of Isaac and then after a few more Bundles and Steam Sales I now have 81 Steam Games. I have more PC games, but those are the ones that Steam manages. Its awesome to be able to pick up any game I want. Its also awesome to have a zillion choices for what to play.
Well. Sort of. On one hand I can pick up a great game on a sale for cheap. On the other hand I have 81 games and the list keeps growing year over year. Placing that next to the fact that we have a limited time, it is becoming apparent to me I have games I may never actually play.
Again, its awesome having so much choice but on the other hand it poses a problem, for me anyway. Like what games I should play? Should you play 50 games at once, I mean I can so that should be awesome. Also having so many games often leaves me at a loss for what to play as there as so many awesome choices and I need to pick the awesomeness choice. I also don't want to just play 4 seconds of each game, I find the best experiences I have are with games I have sunk some serious time into.
One of my friends linked to a TED Talk by Barry Schwartz called "The paradox of Choice." I don't entirely agree with his points in the first few minutes, but found by the end I agree with the crux of his argument. In a world with so many choices, its hard to pick the right one. I don't want to speak for him and his talk is awesome, so ill link to it now:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VO6XEQIsCoM
Over the last month I have come up with a strategy to combat this problem as I love Video Games and want to make what time I have be as much fun as it can be. I limit my choices of games I can play. For instance, right now I am only playing 3 games. Rage: The Scorchers, The Binding of Isaac and Dragon Age: Origins. 3 games might be too many but its a start and so far it has helped out.
So what do you think, do you have a sea of games and if so what do you do?
@Will_Owens had a similar problem and started his blog http://www.backlogkiller.com/ to go through each of his games one by one and blog the process.
It's the cereal aisle conundrum. I can never decide what cereal to buy. You walk into this massive aisle of delicious, grainy goodness, and there are so many choices, what do you pick?
I was faced with this recently with Steam. I finally broke down and started organizing things into categories: Currently playing, coming up next, waiting for DLC, stuff I'll never stop playing, Completed, Meh, etc. This is far less daunting. I put everything I have a currently open game in under "currently playing," and it almost immediately became far less daunting. Thinking about what I wanted to play soon and getting a small category makes me look forward to the next few months.
Coming home from work, wanting to unwind, and being greeted by a massive alphabetical list presents a decision you have to make, which takes away from the fun a bit.
I do think this was better when we were kids. One, NES games were generally short. I've cut SMB1 down to an under 7 minutes speedrun (certainly not worthy of the near sub-5 minute mark speedruns), and even the substantial SMB3 can be completed in a day without warping. Games these days are massive undertakings, which means you don't really play many of them more than once. Plus, there weren't Steam sales back in the day, and we weren't working for our money, so we had to depend on allowances or gifts for our games.
I'm beginning to ramble a bit, but I'll use an argument my history teacher used in high school to explain the efficiency of laws-- they're like tomatoes. When everyone around grows their own tomatoes, and the weather is perfect, nobody will pay more than a few cents for a tomato. When the weather is bad, crops aren't great, and fewer people grow them, their value increases. The same can be said for laws-- a few really good laws will be respected far more than a complex maelstrom of legal red tape and vague speech. The same can also be said for games-- if you have a few good games, you'll appreciate them far more than if you have your pick of whatever is available.
Also, I want that entire wall of games pictured. *drool*
Tell me about it. I only recently started paying attention to Steam sales and I know I went overboard last summer. One of these days, I'll quit acquiring games faster than I can play through them... Or not.
*raises hand*
Guilty as well.
Thanks to the Humble Bundles and the Steam seasonal sales, I have a glut of games, many of which I will probably never play. On the PS3, Sony throws older titles, and occasionally some newer ones, at PS+ subscribers, so that collection has grown.
GameStop has been my friend and nemesis for years. I have this mantra: "No matter how amazing the game at launch, one day it will be $30." While true, when 40 of those titles go to $30 in the same week, this would leave me staring at the used games wall blankly for 30-45 minutes unable to decide what I would take home.
@panickedthumb Thank you for the tip on organizing my library in Steam. That'll help a lot.
Your point about gameplay time is a great one. It's one that I've been ranting about to my wife lately. Sometime in the last 15 years, hours of gameplay became a marketing term; a number to be used to let us know THIS game was better. Some recent examples I can give: Mass Effect 3, Assassins Creed: Brotherhood, Batman: Arkham City and Darksiders II. All three of those titles require logging several hours of gameplay WITHOUT engaging side quests. Need for Speed: Most Wanted has a challenge, for all 41 (46 with DLC) vehicles, awarded after 10 hours of driving.
So, it's tough to find time to play them all. For the most part, I play one big title at a time until I've completed it.
@beanismyname I agree, it is hard to find time to play them all. I usually set aside a few hours per week, but this week wasn't kind to that. :D
After finding too many barely played games on my computer some time ago I seriously cut back on game spending. And I'm finding my time very precious now a days, this limits the amount I'm willing to allocate to computer games.
@MoonWyrd I'm there right now. I have more than enough games to keep me busy for the next few years solid. Time to put the spending on hold.
Spending on hold?? Dude, how will publishers get that 5th yacht?
By selling off a development studio that made a game we all enjoyed 6 months ago...or that was released a week ago. That's worked for EA.
EA.... yeah don't get me started on them.

Valve engineer Ben Krasnow sat down with German gaming site golem.de to discuss their plans. This news comes as no surprise as people have been speculating the Steambox for years now. With all the Windows 8 criticism coming from Newell, and the push for Linux support and Big Picture mode, this was the natural way of things.
This brings up some questions and revelations for me. First, while this is obviously in... Read All It's official, folks. Or as official it can be before an officially official announcement comes around. The Steambox (not the official name, but they should totally use it) is going to be out in 2013, based on Linux, and Valve has other hardware in mind as well.
Valve engineer Ben Krasnow sat down with German gaming site golem.de to discuss their plans. This news comes as no surprise as people have been speculating the Steambox for years now. With all the Windows 8 criticism coming from Newell, and the push for Linux support and Big Picture mode, this was the natural way of things.
This brings up some questions and revelations for me. First, while this is obviously in part a reaction to Windows 8, is this just the way things are going? At this point, while Desktop Linux has less than 2% market share, the Linux kernel itself is on over 40% of consumer computing devices (mostly due to Android phones, tablets, and hell, refrigerators), and is far and away the most used operating system around when all devices are considered. This is telling in many ways-- "computing devices" is a broad term, but usefully so. Computing is moving far from its roots, and into a more device-based model. A Steam console based on Desktop Linux gives Valve a way to keep the desktop while expanding into the device market. I think Valve's business model is evolving to compensate for that.
Second, this is another big platform to support. There are plenty of amazing games to play on Linux currently, but will developers embrace another platform? Steam is a big name, for sure, and if developers want their games on the next big thing from Valve, they'll have to. The question is, what role will this new console fill that the others don't? Personally, the Steambox combined with Steam Cloud would fill a desire I've had for a while-- being able to play a game on my PC in the back with a keyboard and mouse, then continue it on my couch with a controller. You can already do that with a second PC, but presumably the hardware will be standardized and cheaper, and better suited for couch play.
Third, a subject dear to my heart, as many of you know-- what does this mean for Linux in general? If the games released for Steam's new console are Linux games, that means the long-ignored platform will be getting an influx of awesome games. One major reason cited for people choosing to stick with Windows is gaming. Plus, the new push for gaming could mean better drivers, something we've already started to see. Don't get me wrong-- I'm in no way proclaiming 2013 to be the year of the Linux desktop. People have been saying that for a decade now, and it has never come to pass. I don't think 2013 will be any different. But maybe Linux can move from 1.6% to 2.6%, or even 3.6%. Certainly not the grand migration everyone has been hoping for, but enough for it to be considered a valid, important platform.
This is exciting news, and I can't wait to see specs and launch titles.
References:
http://www.golem.de/news/pc-spielekonsole-steam-box-ohne-windows-1212-96609.html
http://www.gamechup.com/steam-box-confirmed-by-valve-engineer-for-2013-will-be-linux-based-report/
I've been rather curious as to how Valve intended to implement a Steambox. Realistically, it's not too hard to convert a game over from win to linux, but will it be worth it for the game producers? Of course there is always the very outside chance that Valve will be building a custom emulator on the back end of Steam. That would be tricky as all hell, but for the price of a Steambox (which isn't looking too cheap) it could be feasible. No matter which way it falls, as a PC gamer this situation will work out to my benefit.
Oh. Obligatory Half Life 3 comment.
Steambox in 2013. 2+0+1+3=6. 6/2=3. Half-Life 3 confirmed!
Seriously though, one thing they could do for *some* Windows games is to have custom Wine configs. Not all games would work like this, of course. It would be similar to what GOG does with DOSBox, and what gogonlinux does for GOG games as well, but on a bigger scale. I think they're pushing pretty hard for native Linux support though (or at least developer supported Wine support, like with Psychonauts) from comments I've read from Gabe.
I feel like they're holding their cards until an official Dota 2 release and another large release so they can turn around and say, "Look what we can do. Work with us and this will all be yours."
I seriously wouldn't be surprised if it was Half-Life 3. I would squeal like a little schoolgirl, but I wouldn't be surprised. A Blue Box would be awesome. Half-Life 3, Portal 3, Team Fortress 3, and Left 4 Dead 3, but that's surely far off.
What would be highly likely is "Buy this and receive our entire catalog for free."
Its really about if the platform gains traction enough to warrant attention for a developer or publisher. In reality, the PS3 is a low powered PC with Open GL etc and some Sony stuff included. It isn't too nuts to port that kind of game to Linux beyond how hard it would be to port it to the PS3 or XBox or whatever. I mean games now days are written with PC, PS3, Xbox & Mac in mind.
My bet is that the Steam box will gain traction because Steam is THE platform for PC games. Why not the console too? It makes a obligatory PSX or XBox 1080 less relevant if gamers have a PC and a Steam box. In a way, I wonder if Valve will obliterate the competition. I mean, it is a possibility I guess.
Anyways also consider making the game available on PC and Steam box might not mean Desktop Linux to a publisher. Especially if Valve ships a non x86 chip in the Steam box. But whatevs in most cases I bet a Linux port would come too. Or maybe I just hope :D
The next few years should be awesome and right now I am holding off on ANY console choices until I see what Valve does. Even if its just a way to get Portal 3 and music, it might be good enough for me.

What video games are you looking forward to in 2013? No table limit, send up as many as you are excited about.
Full disclosure, I don't know a ton about all the games that will be released in 2013 beyond a few. But those few I am very excited about like:
Starcraft 2: Heart of the Swarm, MewGenics and The Binding of Isaac 16 bit de-make. @Gary_Butterfield posted on the Watch out for Fireballs podcast page a question that I wanted to re sound here because I was interested in what everyone was thinking.
What video games are you looking forward to in 2013? No table limit, send up as many as you are excited about.
Full disclosure, I don't know a ton about all the games that will be released in 2013 beyond a few. But those few I am very excited about like:
Starcraft 2: Heart of the Swarm, MewGenics and The Binding of Isaac 16 bit de-make.
This: http://cheerfulghost.com/panickedthumb/posts/881
But also: Starbound. Imagine Terraria with multiple planets to explore.
Hmm...
Probably...
Sir You Are Being Hunted, Routine, Watch Dogs, The Witness, Among the Sleep, Last of Us, Spy Party (fucking FINALLY), Lifeless Planet, Mech Warrior Online (even though you can play it now, it's still technically only in beta),
I could probably do this all day. Those. We'll stick with that list for now.
I forgot about Sir You Are Being Hunted. That looks like such a blast.
Dark Souls 2, first and foremost, then the Edmund McMillen stuff.
Planetary Annihilation. Other than that, we'll have to wait and see.
Awesome, good list of things coming out for sure. Doom 4 might be a stretch but it would be awesome if iD could pull it off.
Perhaps some Fallout news soon?
http://i.imgur.com/DawSi.jpg
Ohhhh, that's good news. Hopefully they get someone good on Fallout 4.
I'm curious as to what that Fallout news actually means. Realistically I will play whatever Fallout game they put infront of me because I'm a huge Fallout fanboy. However I'd like a new, distinct and fresh location. So either they better have a good reason for him to be in this new location or we're back in DC, which I don't really want.
I have heard rumblings about Fallout Boston... Let me see...
Here is the bit:
http://cheerfulghost.com/jdodson/posts/483
@SignalWarden, I agree, DC was awesome but I am looking forward to some new awesome location.
I've heard today that it may be news about a movie, not a new game. Don't know how I feel about that.
To me, the writers are more important than the location. It's my favorite game world, I love it. I want to drink it up. But it needs better writing than Fallout 3, I think.
A movie? Interesting, not sure I am interested in that...
But, you know, I am watching In the Name of the King the Dungeon Siege Movie and its not terrible, just pretty bad. I mean, they used a good camera but the dialog is really sub par.
Haven't seen Burt Reynolds in a film in quite some time....
Keep in mind, I actually loved Fallout 3. I just like 1, 2 and New Vegas more. I'd watch a movie, hopefully it wouldn't be a Uwe Bowl nightmare.
I am going to save the majority of my Dungeon Siege Movie review for a later post(OH YES, PREPARE YOURSELF) but its not technically a nightmare if you dig camp and OH BOY this movie has camp. Unintentionally I am sure, but wow, its so... Laugh out loud funny at times and then at other times the visuals are stunning.
Oh and and I have planned to Dive into New Vegas this year, totally in my Steam queue and on my list.
I am torn between 3 and New Vegas. I think whichever one I'm playing is my favorite of the two. The factions and plot are better in New Vegas (far better) but the world of Fallout 3 is so incredible. If Obsidian had set up all the quests and plot and such, and then Bethesda built the world around it, it would be perfect.
I wish the world of Fallout 3 wasn't 60% subway tunnel. The other thing New Vegas has going for it is companions/characters. The companions in FO3 were trash. In New Vegas, each was an interesting character.
I did like exploring DC, however.
Fawkes in F3 was awesome. I loved his story and how overpowered he is. His story was one of the most compelling game elements to me in the last few years. It was awesome.
I really liked Dogmeat my only minor quip is that he was a dog and barked and growled all the time, that said loved having him in my party.
There has still been talk about the Fallout MMO but I don't think this is related. I would be really surprised if this info were related to a movie, simply because Erik Dellums wouldn't make sense to actually play Three Dog on film. There is also speculation that this game will take the Final Fantasy route and be Fallout 3 II and not Fallout 4, which would explain why it is back in DC, instead of a new location.
I could totally handle Fallout 3 II.
Fawkes was the only companion with any development in that game. Fawkes is neat but I actually don't like how overpowered he is. Compare, however, the bandit you meet in the first town with anyone from New Vegas. Actually, you haven't played New Vegas! Imagine 8 companions with as much depth and nuance as Fawkes, with the added benefit of quests attached to each of them that upgrade them.
The only issue with the companions in New Vegas was that so many of their quests were buggy. I loved it but never being able to upgrade Raul in multiple games was really disappointing. I think if Obsidian had another 4 or 5 months to iron out some issues it would have been so much better.
But yeah, each of the companions is awesome in his/her/it's own way, and the quest lines are complex and interesting. I also like that, unless you're playing on Hardcore, the companions are marked as essential so they just get knocked out rather than dying. And the companion wheel adds so much more control. I was annoyed with the functionality of the companions in Fallout 3 so I never used them. I never go without companions in New Vegas (except in Casinos since they can permanently delete companions' default weapons).
I rolled with Fawkes some, but opted out because of how OP he was. Dogmeat and I went through the whole game together but it was janky at times.
One thing that got me about Dogmeat, Rex, and every dog in Skyrim (yes, it's been a problem for that long) is that they ALWAYS stand in doorways. I once had to reload a save in Skyrim because of a stupid dog.
Yeah they do that. I think I did it mostly because I liked the company. The Capitol wasteland was pretty large and going into tunnels by myself wasn't awesome.
Ooooh shiny. I like what I'm hearing there.
Those are interesting world building bits but dialog/writing is still super important. I can imagine that being great but I can also imagine it being clumsy. I think about something like the PS2 spinoff Fallout game which was fine from a lore perspective but the writing was atrocious and it got disavowed quick.
SimCity is the first big game of 2013 for me. The multiplayer looks like it will be a blast and I have some friends that I think will get a lot of fun out of working on a region together.
SimCity does look really great. I still haven't made the leap to Origins yet but for this game I may very well.
Hadn't heard about the multi-player, that sounds really fun, co-op building would be fun.
I would place Tetris as one of the best games of all time. After playing it on the Gameboy I was hooked. This love for the game brought me to watch "Ecstasy of Order" a recent documentary that... Read All "Tetris. Weâve all played it, rotating the pieces (âtetrominoesâ) and dropping them in the perfect place, or despairing as we discover a piece wonât fit. You may have even joked about âmasteringâ the game during a stint of unemployment, or as a child, before you could afford any other Game Boy cartridges. But what about the people whoâve truly mastered Tetris? Where are the Kasparovs and Fischers, the great champions whoâve dedicated their minds to solving its deepest puzzles?"
I would place Tetris as one of the best games of all time. After playing it on the Gameboy I was hooked. This love for the game brought me to watch "Ecstasy of Order" a recent documentary that covers the history of Tetris and its best tournament players. While the start of the film wasn't to my liking the documentary really gains its steam over time and by the end I was fully immersed in the story.
The documentary shares some space with "The King of Kong" in that it features the current high score keeping organization/arcade Twin Galaxies. "Ecstasy of Order" showcases one of the early Tetris masters, Thor and covers the famed Nintendo World Championships.
I was really impressed with how much effort it takes to be the best at something. The people they show as attending the Twin Galaxies tournaments really are masters at Tetris and even the last place entrants are Wizards of the craft.
If you love Video Game movies and documentaries, I really recommend you watch "Ecstasy of Order." It provides just the right mix of Tetris history and makes some as it brings the best Tetris players from around the world together for an awesome competition.
http://ecstasyoforder.com/
http://www.twingalaxies.com/
This game is totally strange. That said, if one was on some hardcore drugs on the way into a club I could see it playing out like this. Interesting mechanics and game.
I don't think you would see this from EA so its good Indie Games exist :D
Yeah. I like to do quick plays for games that aren't really deep enough to warrant a review. I just needed to do something with this game because it was so damn weird. Effective, but weird. Honestly, I kind of loved it.
That makes sense. The game is totally unique.
I sort of feel that way about stepping back to play FF2(US) this year. I kind of just have to do it again.
That was kinda rad.
I wonder what kind of drugs the player was on? Acid or some such?
This game seems to pull heavily from Grim Fandango but goes off on its own in a good direction. For certain, this game seems like a must play for Adventure Game lovers, no question. I enjoyed the candles, and them in the bed, the game seems chalked full of double meanings for stuff. :D
I also added "The Journey Down" to the games list. If you are reviewing a game not in the list, hit me up and ill add it.
Thanks for posting this, it was fun to watch.