And like last time, I apologize for my sick-sounding self. We recorded this one before the Solo review and you can kinda hear my voice breaking down in real time, so that's exciting.
I think I am one of those people that have a nes classic and snes classic and don't play it enough. I am ashamed. :)
Iâll buy your NES Classic ;)
Hell no. :)
Worth a shot!
> I think I am one of those people that have a nes classic and snes classic and don't play it enough.
I think a lot of people pick it up as a collection piece and play it a bit. I get that, I just play it a bit more than that. Which is cool, because the games it comes with are great and you can add more if you want!
The Spider-Man continues to blow me away. I canât wait. Based on what weâve seen before I donât think itâs going to be heavily corridor based like this gameplay trailer may suggest. There are some segments of the Arkham games that show off the awesome grappling hook and gliding action as well.
But at the same time it could be that they needed to restrict the world a bit to make the web swinging seem believable. I remember previous spider man games that didnât require you to be anywhere near buildings but modern gamers might balk at that.
The Last of Us Part 2 looks so beautiful. And those situational combat tricks were surprising. I enjoyed the first one, I need to actually finish it.
Anothe standout for me might be Ghost of Tsushima. That game is gorgeous and if they can pull it off it will be something I can imagine tossing s lot of hours into. An open world samurai game? Thatâs just such a fresh idea.
Death Stranding, man... I get the idea that you can play that game all the way through and still not have any freakin clue what you just played. In terms of plot that is. It looks compelling but at the same time offputting depending on my mood.
Control looks pretty solid. Like a freaky sci-fi third-person action game. The powers they showed look pretty unique.
The Resident Evil 2 Remaster looks great so far. If you can even call it that. I guess Remake is a better term. The graphics are done so well, and it looks like some jump scares are in our future.
To me it felt like the Sony E3 presentation catered more to solo play experiences compared to the Microsoft E3 presentation. For that reason, I am probably more excited about what Sony is bringing to the table compared to Microsoft.
That seems to be pretty typical. Almost all of Sonyâs exclusives seem to be single player and I love them for that.
https://kotaku.com/swinging-through-new-york-city-as-spidey-feels-effortle-1826773221
This description of the demo involves pretty free reign to swing anywhere in NYC suggesting that the corridor worry isnât going to be a problem.
It's not like "Watch paint dry simulator 5000" is ever going to make it to the top of the charts. In general, people will have to dig for the crap.
I think, anyway.
But back in the early days of Windows 8/10 you could open the app store and be presented with just a flood of garbage. You can still get bombarded with crap but it's gotten better. I think Steam already having a massive following and full of good stuff will help keep the crap at the bottom.
I think this is a reaction to their recent attempts at curating some things (like dating sims) and getting backlash. This is the easy way out but it may be fine as long as their ranking algorithms can keep it in check.
Yeah, that's something they've mentioned they have yet to fully address. THAT SAID, I wonder what the real criticism is because if I was in the market to buy a ton of PC games i'd say Steam does a good job finding what i'd like. Are people not seeing the latest and greatest Triple A game and only seeing two hour game jam games?
Honestly my problem isn't that I don't know about great games I just don't have time to play them all.
If you go through the discovery queue you will see a lot of meme games and asset swaps but if youâre browsing through they donât show up if you click on a game genre for example.
Good to know.
I liked the part where I was right and we're not getting any new Elder Scrolls content or announcements this year!
When you went to your fridge did you play Skyrim?
I donât have a Samsung Smart Fridge unfortunately.
Nah, my fridge is still powered by the ice delivery man.
Anyways, Elder Scrolls Blades looks really fun. I signed up for the beta and they didn't have the iPhone 6S as an option. It was all iPhone 7's and higher plus Androids. They let me select other but I wonder if it requires a much newer phone than I have?
I'm disappointed with the Fallout 76 part about being online-only. and that we don't know if you can play w/out other players. If there isn't a single player aspect to it, I'll probably pass on it. I have been playing some games that their original game play intention was online and with others PVE and PVP. However, I play those games in single player mode. I usually prefer to play alone, but I do enjoy playing with friends (not against) sometimes, too. Maybe the beta test will be interesting and maybe in due time I'll have a better understanding of the game.
What?! I just told Jon we probably won't see Elder Scrolls VI for many years, but they showed the world?! Wow! I have to go check that out. I wonder if it'll be ready in less than 5 years. Thanks for the info!!!!
Oh well this article says there is solo mode (I guess we just have to presume w/out other players?). Maybe it's kind of like Diablo III. https://www.gamespot.com/articles/fallout-76-is-an-always-online-multiplayer-focused/1100-6459647/?utm_source=gamefaqs&utm_medium=partner&utm_content=news_module&utm_campaign=homepage
Todd said you could play solo but I play MMOs mostly solo. That doesnât necessarily mean you can play single-player. We still need some more details about the specifics there.
Alexa Skyrim: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07D6STSX8/
Oh wow. I assumed that was pure joke.
Travis, I did too.
Yeah, sorry, I watched a video about it after I wrote that.
https://youtu.be/PdYtulRRfDU
Interview with Todd Howard linked above. He clarified a lot about Fallout 76.
There is no offline mode. Playing solo does NOT mean you will be playing alone. They're working on ways to opt out of PvP and balancing the rewards for people who aren't interested in that kind of gameplay.
VATS is going to be present but it won't slow time like it has.
There are no NPCs aside from robots. Presumably other than the Overseer but that may just be a voice on the intercom in the vault and nothing else. There's still a world to discover via terminals and things like that, but there are no NPCs. That seems weird but they could make that work.
Mods will come, but not at launch. Private worlds will come, so you can mod up your server the way you want, but not at launch.
Thanks Travis, that's great news. Gonna watch it with the stack of other videos 
I dunno about great news but hopeful for sure. If they can keep griefing from being a problem then most of my worries are gone.
It's showing they are at least listening and thinking about it. They might be making a game that's not meant to be played by yourself or at least right away because private servers aren't coming at launch.
"Listening" I'm not sure about since they just announced it and haven't exactly had time to react to anything people have said. But it definitely shows they knew what people would be concerned about and are working on those things.
I don't know what you mean about it not being a game for me. I went into their conference knowing that it would almost definitely be online only and was still interested. I've already said that even with my questions about it I'm very interested. I don't need private servers. I play MMOs some. For me it's just about being able to have fun playing a game without a troop of assholes wrecking my fun, and that's where the questions still lie, as for what kinds of things are planned to prevent that. He did specifically say that griefing is something they're spending a lot of time working out, thus it's hopeful news.
> I don't know what you mean about it not being a game for me.
Sorry for the confusion there. When I said "not mean to be played by yourself" I mean't it wasn't to be played single player by yourself. This game does seem to be a multiplayer game and that's cool with me. I'm not sure if i'll get it yet, but it's interesting. I think I want to know more but playing a Fallout game with friends does sound neat.
> For me it's just about being able to have fun playing a game without a troop of assholes wrecking my fun, and that's where the questions still lie, as for what kinds of things are planned to prevent that. He did specifically say that griefing is something they're spending a lot of time working out, thus it's hopeful news.
Yeah that's big for me too. I don't want to build a base and have people smash it up. That's why we have Cheerful Ghost private Terraria servers.
Ohhhh "By yourself"
I get it. lol
Thanks for the link, Travis! They did remind us about that interview that I was referencing when I said the Elder Scrolls VI is years away, because the technology isn't there....yet. Unfortunately, I still have questions about Fallout 76. It'd be cool if it was an online game such as Diablo III, or like GTAV which has GTA Online separately. This one seems to be more of GTA Online. I would rather play on my own with NPCs than real people (with some already noted exceptions). I may let this one slide for a bit and I'll wait for you or someone else here or somewhere else get it and let me read more about it, so I can decide whether or not to get it. It does look cool and being 4 times bigger than Fallout 4 is impressive. I'm also glad that you can build anywhere and that building is now part of the game. We'll see.....
Doom Eternal sounds cool, too. I just watched a quick video about it. They said it will debut at QuakeCon in August, I interpret that as a release date/time. It does sound awesome like Doom and looks kinda cool. I'm interested, but I just hope the season pass (assuming they have one again) isn't full of multiplayer only stuff. https://youtu.be/umShGxEAw2E
That doesnât mean a release in August, thatâs just when theyâll be giving it a proper showing.
While it wouldnât be unheard of for Bethesda to drop one of their âand its available... right now!â, they would want to show it off and then leave time for pre-orders for such a huge game.
Right.
There was a behind the scenes mini-doc and interview that gave us some new info about Fallout 76.
This is a reddit post that breaks down the new info and links to the video if you want to watch the full video
https://reddit.com/r/Fallout/comments/8qsx8s/complete_notes_from_the_noclip_documentary/
This mostly hit all the notes I wanted it to. You canât just get repeatedly killed by the same person. That kind of targeted griefing isnât possible. But you can still get randomly killed because they want that kind of danger. You donât lose anything, you just respawn, and people who do this get bounties so if you grief you have a target on your back.
Also nukes can be used on players but considering how hard they are to get, it would be wasteful to do so. The player you nuked respawns and you lose the potential loot you would have gotten from nuking a better spot.
It does really seem like theyâve balanced things pretty well.
LOTS of people are saying great things about Rage 2, which this and Elder Scrolls Blades are the two games i'm most excited to play soon. Fallout 76 looks interesting but i'm not sure i'll actually play it when it drops as I haven't finished Fallout 4. I was addicted to Fallout 3 but I just didn't have a similar experience with 4 even though I enjoyed what I played.
https://www.gamesradar.com/i-played-the-rage-2-demo-four-times-in-a-row-and-it-got-better-and-smarter-every-time-heres-what-i-learned/
Saying that I'm more interested in a Rage sequel than a Fallout game feels weird, but Rage 2 is high up on my most anticipated list. Right below Spiderman.
Itâs worth noting that thereâs no Steam page for Fallout 76 or Rage 2. And based on this FAQ it looks like the Bethesda launcher may be the only way to get them.
https://fallout.bethesda.net/faq
Sounds like they are going the Blizzard route.
I don't think it's a good move to only have the game via their launcher. I think it'd sell a hell of a lot better on Steam, they could use both platforms.
They would sell a lot more copies for sure but those micro-transactions for cosmetics would get the Steam tax. They might figure they can get more money on their own turf. What may happen is an initial launch on their own launcher and then a month or so later launch it on Steam. This is just spitballing on my part.
The only place to play Fortnite is via Epicâs launcher and they seem to be doing pretty well.
Itâs also worth noting that this may just be for the beta and the final release may go on Steam. Itâs hard to tell. But the only way to get into the beta is to preorder, and the only way to preorder seems to be their launcher.
I bet this is just for the beta:
"A: The B.E.T.A. will be available on Xbox One, PlayStation 4, and on PC (via Bethesda.net). Stay tuned for exact timing for each platform here and @Fallout on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. Please note that the B.E.T.A. for Xbox One will begin first, followed by other platforms."
I'm fairly sure they will push to Steam as they have for Quake Champions. It's a pretty big store and they'd miss a few sales if they didn't. Might be an interesting long term goal for them but in the case of Blizzard they went from box copies to selling it on Battle.net so the transition was pretty seamless.
I would agree except that there's just no Steam page for pre-ordering, and right after E3 is when people are excited about that and their previous games that were announced with a release date later in the year have all gone up there immediately. I'm like 50/50 on it.
Two-months-later necro bump
https://www.overclock3d.net/news/software/fallout_76_won_t_be_released_on_steam_-_pc_version_will_be_exclusive_to_bethesda_net/1
No Steam version of Fallout 76.
Honestly the POTENTIALLY worse news here is that they're shooting to have beta progress transfer over to the full game.
Which means people who preorder have a clear advantage in this.
I say "potentially" though, because it depends a lot on how they deal with balance.
It was only a matter of time before they kept their next game to the Beth client. Now Iâm wondering if 76 will be free to play akin to Fortnight?
It may be eventually but the beta requires a preorder so it wonât be for launch or a lot of people who are out $60 would be very upset.
Ah right, that's good to know. I guess we might see Fallout 5 and everything else on the Beth client then to launch. I wonder if they will do a timed year exclusive or even longer?
Also wondering if this is how iD games will end up? Not Quake Live obviously as that's on Steam already but at some point will they be Beth client exclusives?
It seems like at a certain point publishers can save money running their own servers and skipping the 30% Steam tax. I imagine if it goes well for them, this may be the way forward for Bethesda.
Is this going to go the way of the Neo Geo X?
I had to look up the Neo Geo X. I had never even heard of it. So I really hope it doesnât? The X sounds like a comedy of errors, nothing went right for that device.
I have the X.
How is it?
I haven't put much time into it. I enjoyed it last time I played with it.
I like this collection of games and if it reviews well i'll pick it up. In the video the controller looked a bit cramped which isn't a great way to play fighting games or Metal Slug.
A new Star Wars Game, Jedi Fallen Order was teased. No details, no images, nothing. But it's a tease!
Battlefront 2 is getting some Clone Wars content and a lot of other changes that many have been wanting.
The question about Anthem is which part of Bioware is on it. Andromeda was a game I thoroughly enjoyed and nearly-if-not-entirely completed to 100% completion, but it wasn't as good as its predecessors and missed the mark for many gamers, to the point where they canceled planned DLC (I was majorly bummed by that). I wonder what lessons they've taken from that experience.
Oh, and DICE is bringing Battle Royale to Battlefield, because of course they are. It would be more surprising if that DIDN'T happen at this point. It's the cash cow. I'm waiting for Tetris Battle Royale.
Man, I wish instead they'd remaster the classic C&C games.
Games or movies? Yikes.
Super Mario World > Super Mario Odyssey > SMB 3 > the originals
Aliens > Alien but not by a ton
Terminator 2 > 1 by a lot
Fallout 3 > Fallout 1 and 2 (donât @ me)
God of War > God of War. Wait what?
Mass effect 2 > Mass Effect
Empire > ANH and I wonât comment on the rest of those at the moment
TMNT2 > TMNT (NES, not the movies)
Toy Story 2 > Toy Story
I could go on but I wonât. Those are the ones they just came to me. I think video game sequels are more frequently improvements on their predecessors than movies. At least they used to be. That may be going a different way now with the annual churn of some games.
Yeah lots of video game sequels are better. Borderlands 2 came to me but I really liked the original.
