Its beautiful. Plus has some really awesome hardware that comes with it. Looks to be on the expensive side now but ... that could come down as the mass produce them?
Regardless, this is awesome news!
Travis Admin Post Author
wrote on 01/09/2013 at 02:13am
There's no way this goes to market at 1k. It would just get laughed at.
They are saying you can upgrade it easily which is good because when they pulled it apart the video card didn't look all that powerful. I can't see how you can install a card with more juice that isn't made specifically for it though because the form factor is pretty tight. Wait and see I suppose.
I think we are entering a zone where the current tech we have now is ridiculously powerful. I don't mean the PS3 or XBox, you can cram much more power in a smaller device.
But even if it were just a PS3 or perhaps 2X a PS3 it would be beefy enough to play all the games out now plus the games going forward. I think Carmack said in a recent Quakecon that they would make games for the current consoles for another generation or so. I think the current PS3 power scale has some legs on it yet even if it is pretty underpowered by the standard the PC I am using sets. Or my Macbook for that matter.
Travis Admin Post Author
wrote on 01/09/2013 at 09:25pm
So, I checked out their website and what they currently sell is not that impressive. They're using older AMD Processors and pretty low end RAM and HDD parts. It is a neat looking product, but like others have said, it is just a really small form factor. I think something like the Intel NUC might be a better starting point for a game content consumption device.
Ah, well then its good others are building versions of this. I imagine the first generation might not be as powerful as it could be. Then again, it doesn't take much to get to the point of the current gen consoles. That said, I would like to see a Steam Box that would do 1080p and do it well for most games.
If you want to join this conversation you need to sign in.
It's official, folks. Or as official it can be before an officially official announcement comes around. The Steambox (not the official name, but they should totally use it) is going to be out in 2013, based on Linux, and Valve has other hardware in mind as well.
Valve engineer Ben Krasnow sat down with German gaming site golem.de to discuss their plans. This news comes as no surprise as people have been speculating the Steambox for years now. With all the Windows 8 criticism coming from Newell, and the push for Linux support and Big Picture mode, this was the natural way of things.
This brings up some questions and revelations for me. First, while this is obviously in part a reaction to Windows 8, is this just the way things are going? At this point, while Desktop Linux has less than 2% market share, the Linux kernel itself is on over 40% of consumer computing devices (mostly due to Android phones, tablets, and hell, refrigerators), and is far and away the most used operating system around when all devices are considered. This is telling in many ways-- "computing devices" is a broad term, but usefully so. Computing is moving far from its roots, and into a more device-based model. A Steam console based on Desktop Linux gives Valve a way to keep the desktop while expanding into the device market. I think Valve's business model is evolving to compensate for that.
Second, this is another big platform to support. There are plenty of amazing games to play on Linux currently, but will developers embrace another platform? Steam is a big name, for sure, and if developers want their games on the next big thing from Valve, they'll have to. The question is, what role will this new console fill that the others don't? Personally, the Steambox combined with Steam Cloud would fill a desire I've had for a while-- being able to play a game on my PC in the back with a keyboard and mouse, then continue it on my couch with a controller. You can already do that with a second PC, but presumably the hardware will be standardized and cheaper, and better suited for couch play.
Third, a subject dear to my heart, as many of you know-- what does this mean for Linux in general? If the games released for Steam's new console are Linux games, that means the long-ignored platform will be getting an influx of awesome games. One major reason cited for people choosing to stick with Windows is gaming. Plus, the new push for gaming could mean better drivers, something we've already started to see. Don't get me wrong-- I'm in no way proclaiming 2013 to be the year of the Linux desktop. People have been saying that for a decade now, and it has never come to pass. I don't think 2013 will be any different. But maybe Linux can move from 1.6% to 2.6%, or even 3.6%. Certainly not the grand migration everyone has been hoping for, but enough for it to be considered a valid, important platform.
This is exciting news, and I can't wait to see specs and launch titles.
I've been rather curious as to how Valve intended to implement a Steambox. Realistically, it's not too hard to convert a game over from win to linux, but will it be worth it for the game producers? Of course there is always the very outside chance that Valve will be building a custom emulator on the back end of Steam. That would be tricky as all hell, but for the price of a Steambox (which isn't looking too cheap) it could be feasible. No matter which way it falls, as a PC gamer this situation will work out to my benefit.
Oh. Obligatory Half Life 3 comment.
Travis Admin Post Author
wrote on 01/06/2013 at 05:15am
Steambox in 2013. 2+0+1+3=6. 6/2=3. Half-Life 3 confirmed!
Seriously though, one thing they could do for *some* Windows games is to have custom Wine configs. Not all games would work like this, of course. It would be similar to what GOG does with DOSBox, and what gogonlinux does for GOG games as well, but on a bigger scale. I think they're pushing pretty hard for native Linux support though (or at least developer supported Wine support, like with Psychonauts) from comments I've read from Gabe.
I feel like they're holding their cards until an official Dota 2 release and another large release so they can turn around and say, "Look what we can do. Work with us and this will all be yours."
Travis Admin Post Author
wrote on 01/06/2013 at 06:35am
I seriously wouldn't be surprised if it was Half-Life 3. I would squeal like a little schoolgirl, but I wouldn't be surprised. A Blue Box would be awesome. Half-Life 3, Portal 3, Team Fortress 3, and Left 4 Dead 3, but that's surely far off.
What would be highly likely is "Buy this and receive our entire catalog for free."
Its really about if the platform gains traction enough to warrant attention for a developer or publisher. In reality, the PS3 is a low powered PC with Open GL etc and some Sony stuff included. It isn't too nuts to port that kind of game to Linux beyond how hard it would be to port it to the PS3 or XBox or whatever. I mean games now days are written with PC, PS3, Xbox & Mac in mind.
My bet is that the Steam box will gain traction because Steam is THE platform for PC games. Why not the console too? It makes a obligatory PSX or XBox 1080 less relevant if gamers have a PC and a Steam box. In a way, I wonder if Valve will obliterate the competition. I mean, it is a possibility I guess.
Anyways also consider making the game available on PC and Steam box might not mean Desktop Linux to a publisher. Especially if Valve ships a non x86 chip in the Steam box. But whatevs in most cases I bet a Linux port would come too. Or maybe I just hope :D
The next few years should be awesome and right now I am holding off on ANY console choices until I see what Valve does. Even if its just a way to get Portal 3 and music, it might be good enough for me.
If you want to join this conversation you need to sign in.
UPDATE: This is not a real trailer. It's really the game, it's just a very early version that was never meant to be shown to the public. This was posted all over gaming news sites and even the social media manager at Activision posted it, so I don't feel so bad.
So here's another game for The Walking Dead. There's the Telltale adventure game, the Facebook game, and now this first-person survival game published by Activision. None of these are related at all except by the source material. I worry this will be confusing for some consumers.
I'll be fair and say that, no, I haven't played this game. And this may be super-early production for all I know. But this trailer for the new Walking Dead game just looks bad. You play as fan-favorite and heart throb Daryl Dixon, a character from the show. It doesn't appear to do him justice.
I'll wait for the final cut to come out before making any real judgments, but I'm not sold.
Yeah, no. The Telltale game is so good because it captures the spirit of the world/comic perfectly. The show, while decent, doesn't. An imitation of an imitation probably has limited potential.
Seems like the video has been pulled. The Walking Dead is hella popular now so it makes sense to me that make things would pop up with that property.
I have heard that the game is stronger than the show, but that the show is good. Haven't started the show myself as I am waiting for it to be over to plow through them all in a few weeks on Netflix. Netflix has forever changed how I approach TV shows.
In my opinion it goes Comic->Game------>Show. The show is good but it doesn't have the character power the other media does. It took 1.5 seasons for the show to get good, I think. That said, I haven't watched much of the 3rd season.
Travis Admin Post Author
wrote on 01/04/2013 at 01:35am
Gary, interesting, as I thought the show was great through season 1, and then not so great in season 2, but is pulling itself back around in season 3. And oooooh season 3. So good.
The first half of Season 2 is abysmal, i think. Season 1 is pretty OK but I've got source material to compare it to, which isn't fair, but I can't help it. I think the turning point in Season 2 is the scene in the bar in town. Then it gets good. I'm looking forward to season 3 but I'm waiting for more of it to come out first.
If you want to join this conversation you need to sign in.
This is a video for Jurassic Life, a new Source mod coming out "when it's ready." This is currently a work-in-progress, entirely fan-made, with tons of new... everything! New AI, new textures, models, environments... and it could be the great Jurassic Park game we've been waiting for. I'm always curious in situations like this whether the IP owners will have anything to say about it. I'd be surprised if Universal doesn't go after them, but maybe they'll be nice about it. Free publicity right?
This is interesting. They have plenty of shots from the movie present, and John Williams score brings me right back for sure. I wonder if the game will be a multiplayer or single player experience? Both? From the video I sort of wondered if it would be Humans VS. Dinosaurs Deathmatch? Interested in knowing how this turns out as there are not a ton of mods released that I actually play.
If you want to join this conversation you need to sign in.
WARNING: This video is from James Rolfe. If you're unfamiliar with him or his character the Angry Video Game Nerd, there is a lot of adult humor and language. You've been warned! :)
I was catching up on some AVGN when I found a new series with James Rolfe and Mike Matei just playing games and chatting about them. This one in particular got me thinking about the old days with friends all crowded around the TV in the floor, playing the new game you just rented obsessively. Much has changed with games getting huge and the internet enabling remote multiplayer, and not all for the better.
I can remember so many hours spent playing so many games, including but not limited to Mortal Kombat, NHL, Double Dragon, and of course Super Mario Bros. 3 with friends. There's something special about sitting next to someone that is lost entirely in the internet multiplayer days. The experience just isn't personal. Even with voice communication, it's hard to really focus on everything at once. It's considered a distraction to just talk about whatever and react to things you find interesting or funny as you play.
It seems like there's a resurgence of this lately, to an unfortunately small degree. Games like Borderlands 2 allow split-screen on consoles. Serious Sam 3 even allows split-screen on PC with multiple keyboards and mice. And Nintendo is one major player that still keeps this going strong. Even in Super Mario Galaxy there were minor things a second player could do to influence the world. I couldn't have gotten all the stars without my wife's help!
But for the most part, multiplayer is online-only these days, taking social gaming into a less social place than where it could be. It's amazing that we can play games with people all across the world, but it's sad that some people will never experience the joy of couch multiplayer. Perhaps I'm just being a bit of a gaming hipster, and my gaming proclivities haven't kept up with the times. Maybe I'm wrong, and it's just that I'm nostalgic for a time when gaming was a brave new world to me. What do you think?
In person I'd say its easier to just play split-screen muiltiplayer on a console than get a game working across a few computers. At least, lately it seems to have gotten harder for some of my friends. Plus they have to have a beefy laptop as no one, generally speaking, wants to bring over a desktop anymore.
I wish Nintendo wasn't the only company to still do 4 player split-screen though. Like I bet we would play more split-screen on console if the typical ps3 game was more than just two player, shooter especially.
That said, like you I had a great time with Mario Galaxy playing it with my wife. She loved collecting the stars, shaking bushes and helping push back bad guys.
I do miss the days of couch multiplayer and LAN parties. Playing on-line is awesome, but it's just not the same as having your friends there in person.
Then again, as teens my friends and I had a lot more free time to plan entire evenings to playing. As adults, it's difficult to arrange our schedules to align well enough for an hour or two of gaming on-line, let alone trying to meet in person. Still, it would be nice if more games at least gave you the option of local multiplayer.
If you want to join this conversation you need to sign in.
We've done the tallying and come up with the winners!
We had a lot of amazing entries. Some funny and heroic name entries, and some great personal stories and epic tales from the world of Torchlight. It was tough, but Nayelianne was our favorite! Her entry really put us in her mind while playing Torchlight, and showed us how important and awesome her experience was, as well as the disappointment with not having multiplayer. She evoked feelings we've all had gaming at one time or another, I'd imagine. http://cheerfulghost.com/Nayelianne/posts/790
The random number generator at random.org gave us Pavel_Krzystyniak's post. His epic tale of heroism was also high up in our list when trying to choose our favorite, so it was very serendipitous that random.org chose him. http://cheerfulghost.com/Pavel_Krzystyniak/posts/848
I just changed my avatar actually. I realized I have been meaning to make it me for sometime and just didn't get around to it. BACK TO REGULAR OL JDODSON! :D
Travis Admin Post Author
wrote on 12/22/2012 at 11:42pm
Still Spock here, I guess gravatar takes a few minutes to update.
This is the best surprise ever. Thank you so much! I just wanted to state that, winning aside, the site name was certainly a suitable choice, because my experience with it has been nothing but cheerful indeed!
From the moment I joined I noticed the staff has been very thoughtful towards its users, and I hope this community will grow as beautifully as it deserves <3
Kotaku has a great run-down of everything that's wrong, but to briefly summarize:
* It looks a lot like a Day Z ripoff. That's negotiable, but it's incredibly similar.
* They have a game you have to pay for, is still in beta, but has a multitude of microtransactions like Free-to-Play MMO's. Including one to respawn. If you don't pay a microtransaction when you die, apparently you have to wait hours before you can play again.
* They lied about the features of the game.
* They didn't mention that they were in beta still when they went on the Steam store.
* They wrongfully banned tons of people.
* They are blocking bad things being said about them in the forums.
* Thousands of people are signing petitions about the game.
* They ripped (at least part of) their terms of use from League of Legends.
* They apparently stole some images from The Walking Dead.
The full breakdown is on Kotaku. I want to be fair about this, I really do, but it's obvious that this is incredibly shady at best. Developers shouldn't be allowed to treat people like this. Vote with your wallets, people.
I have heard some about this but haven't been presented with all the details. If all this is true, its pretty unfortunate. I don't like the zillion microtransactions NOR ripping off players.
I don't mind game clones myself as everyone is a clone of something and technically like all shooters are Doom clones :D
I'm glad I played the beta for free. Its such an awful game. When I saw it on steam I immediately dismissed it and refused to even look at it. I read some of the things posted on the game community tab thingy and most people are just as displeased as I was. Perhaps even more.
Travis Admin Post Author
wrote on 12/20/2012 at 03:51am
Jon, Doom was a Wolfenstein clone!
BR, yeah I think more, because of the new "features" and the false advertising.
This Thursday, Dec 20, we will be having a game night at 9PM EST, 6PM PST. A few games to choose from-- Starcraft 2, Left 4 Dead 2, or Team Fortress 2. Hit up the comments to vote for which one you want to play, and we will meet up Thursday night to kick ass and chew bubble gum, only we'll be all out of gum. We'll make another post once the game is decided.
Installing it requires a few steps (you can read up on them on the "Getting Started" page) but using the software seems straight-forward. Just log into your GOG account, and it handles downloading and installing the games for you.
There are currently only a few games present. It isn't currently using Linux ports, but things like Wine, Dosbox, and Scummvm to run games with the most compatible configuration.
Hopefully with Steam's Linux client looking toward release, and Desura's presence for some time now, GOG will do something official for Linux soon. They recently started a Mac section, and this project combined with other providers supporting Linux shows that the demand is there. Until then, though, this is another tool for your Linux gaming arsenal.
This is pretty interesting. Some publishers will more than likely never port a game to Linux so getting it to run with Wine, Scummvm or Dosbox is a good path. Lest some games be lost to us.
Travis Admin Post Author
wrote on 12/09/2012 at 07:33pm
Agreed. Many argue that people using Wine to successfully run games on Linux only prevents developers from releasing Linux versions of their games, but I disagree. I think getting more people playing on Linux will show the demand.
If you want to join this conversation you need to sign in.
Travis Admin Post Author
wrote on 12/09/2012 at 06:32am
I've been doing some digging as well. It appears this is a fan-made game that got Capcom's blessing and they're also doing promotion and distribution. So official, yet not. This is awesome of Capcom.
This is pretty awesome. A lot of companies would have just slapped the fan made game with a take down notice, but Capcom has done something awesome instead. And after the whole on-disc DLC thing, they can really use the good publicity. Good job Capcom!
As for the game, I will definitely be checking this out. I gotta get a controller for my PC now!
If you want to join this conversation you need to sign in.
Its beautiful. Plus has some really awesome hardware that comes with it. Looks to be on the expensive side now but ... that could come down as the mass produce them?
Regardless, this is awesome news!
There's no way this goes to market at 1k. It would just get laughed at.
I agree. Ill pick one up as soon as I can for anything around $300.
They are saying you can upgrade it easily which is good because when they pulled it apart the video card didn't look all that powerful. I can't see how you can install a card with more juice that isn't made specifically for it though because the form factor is pretty tight. Wait and see I suppose.
I think we are entering a zone where the current tech we have now is ridiculously powerful. I don't mean the PS3 or XBox, you can cram much more power in a smaller device.
But even if it were just a PS3 or perhaps 2X a PS3 it would be beefy enough to play all the games out now plus the games going forward. I think Carmack said in a recent Quakecon that they would make games for the current consoles for another generation or so. I think the current PS3 power scale has some legs on it yet even if it is pretty underpowered by the standard the PC I am using sets. Or my Macbook for that matter.
Sig-- maybe they'll give us one of these.
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/3117g8sD8hL._SL500_SS500_.jpg
Hahahaha, double the RAM with all the style of fire engine red!
Hahaha. You better believe I had one of those. Donkey Kong Country wouldn't run without it!
So, I checked out their website and what they currently sell is not that impressive. They're using older AMD Processors and pretty low end RAM and HDD parts. It is a neat looking product, but like others have said, it is just a really small form factor. I think something like the Intel NUC might be a better starting point for a game content consumption device.
Ah, well then its good others are building versions of this. I imagine the first generation might not be as powerful as it could be. Then again, it doesn't take much to get to the point of the current gen consoles. That said, I would like to see a Steam Box that would do 1080p and do it well for most games.