Cheerful Ghost: An Awesome Community For Gamers

Giving an Interview: A Few Steps To Rad

Since launching the site I realize the stuff I do might seem a bit out of reach to some. Over the last bit I have improved as a write and I am getting better at sharing content that people want to read. One thing that I started doing over the course of the site was to send interviews to people in gaming I respected. I was really nervous giving the first couple, but after that it got easier.

If you have been considering sending out a gaming related interview, I recommend you do so and as such want to help the process for you. I have a few thoughts that might things a bit easier so you can publish your first interview.

whom to talk to?

First off you might have an idea of... Read All

Travis Admin wrote on 04/10/2013 at 01:38pm

You've done more of these than I have, but one thing I would recommend is-- know what you want to ask before you ask for an interview. For example, I'd absolutely love to talk to Todd Howard, but I have no clue what I'd actually ask him in an interview that he hasn't already answered a thousand times.

jdodson Admin Post Author wrote on 04/10/2013 at 01:47pm

jdodson: Bbbb buuut why are you SO Awesome? Might sound great in your head but... Yeah I agree Travis, start with an idea for sure! :D

AdamPFarnsworth wrote on 04/10/2013 at 07:19pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpHVOSYlOv0

The proper way to interview.

Travis Admin wrote on 04/10/2013 at 09:10pm

Adym, I knew what that was going to be before clicking on it. I was never a fan of Chris Farley really, but those interviews were incredible.

AdamPFarnsworth wrote on 04/10/2013 at 09:24pm

@Travis +1

If you want to join this conversation you need to sign in.

My Card Game, Cool Cats Battle.

http://imgur.com/5I6g6Yd

Well... I have been making my own card game. Its kinda like rock paper scissors but you have limited cards. I don't know how to explain it but basically you say one...2...3 and then you and your friend slap down your cards and see who wins. Its fast action which = fun.

Above is a picture of the first card in my basic set.

Thx for responses and ideas!

What Are You Playing Right Now?

Just curious what everyone is playing right now?

What I have been playing over the last few days:

Spaceward Ho on my iPhone

Age of Empires Online

scrypt Supporter wrote on 04/09/2013 at 07:33am

In the past week or so it's been a little of this and that, with primary focus on:

- Bioshock Infinite (currently in 2nd play through)
- Vanquish
- Tomb Raider (just getting started)

I've recently started keeping a game journal, in an attempt to better analyze game design structure. As such, I've been playing a lot of games more for work than just entertainment, so I won't count those. Interesting challenge, though!

jaelte wrote on 04/09/2013 at 07:34am

I've been back on Skyrim lately. I'd stopped playing when other games came out and distracted me. Anyway, I've played it 135 hours so far and I don't think I'm anywhere close to beating the game, but I'm still enjoying it for the time being.

Travis Admin wrote on 04/09/2013 at 01:21pm

Awesome gif :)

I'm revisiting Dishonored. It came out at the wrong time and got overshadowed by Borderlands 2.

BR Supporter wrote on 04/09/2013 at 02:35pm

Recently I've been into World of tanks and war thunder. I am looking for something new to play though.

krcDeuce Supporter wrote on 04/09/2013 at 06:32pm

I downloaded the Starcraft: Wings of Liberty demo a few weeks ago, but I've been doing more game development than I have been game playing.

AdamPFarnsworth wrote on 04/09/2013 at 07:55pm

I too have been busy (with @krcDeuce) with development more than playing lately. But I did take an evening last week to play Age of Empires online, and I've gone through Solar 2 a few times.

Oh, and I've been killing random free time with Eufloria, which I definitely recommend as a very unique RTS (on my Android phone)

AutoCat1000 wrote on 04/09/2013 at 11:17pm

i play MINECRAFT, Garry's mod, and a tiny little bit of nothing.

AutoCat1000 wrote on 04/09/2013 at 11:18pm

and i little bit of programming

Nick_Donahoo wrote on 04/10/2013 at 06:15pm

I'm still slogging through my Bioshock Infinite 1999 play through. I am getting my wife to try Tomb Raider though.

jdodson Admin Post Author wrote on 04/10/2013 at 07:17pm

Awesome. How is 1999 mode compared to normal?

Nick_Donahoo wrote on 04/10/2013 at 10:30pm

merciless. A lot of hiding and cheap tactics on my part. and expensive. 100 bucks per continue? ouch.

Still, a worthy challenge, and a lot of fun.

jdodson Admin Post Author wrote on 04/11/2013 at 01:27am

Awesome. Good that the game is fun on the second play though!

BR Supporter wrote on 04/11/2013 at 02:49am

Just picked up prison architect on steam and I got to say, having a lot of fun with it. Even though its in alpha still. Great game with great potential.

Blue_Element wrote on 04/11/2013 at 03:36am

I've been playing: a lot of Realm of the Mad God, Minecraft (specifically this fun CTF server), Overgrowth, and Black Ops 2 Zombie Mode. All of which games that you can play virtually forever, which in my opinion are the best types of games!

jdodson Admin Post Author wrote on 04/11/2013 at 03:35pm

Prison Architect looks great, ill have to check that out!

Game I want to be playing right now: Starbound :D

BR Supporter wrote on 04/11/2013 at 04:15pm

Little tip for those if you that may have or will be getting prison architect: don't block your delivery zone from the street. I had a truck load of prisoners that just drove right past my prison. Not sure where they went but I'm pretty sure they aren't in a prison which can't be safe considering they were all in for assault or burglary.

jdodson Admin Post Author wrote on 04/11/2013 at 05:14pm

Hahaha, good point, thanks BR! Maybe they made a detour to Taco Bell or something...

BR Supporter wrote on 04/11/2013 at 06:41pm

Its been about two days since they left. Maybe they were really hungry...

AdamPFarnsworth wrote on 04/11/2013 at 06:47pm

A run for the border?

BR Supporter wrote on 04/11/2013 at 07:06pm

I did have 2 prisoners who escaped...its actually kinda funny. I got 8 prisoners and they all tried to escape soon as they were put into cells. So now I have 4 unconscious prisoners who try to escape every time they wake up.

jdodson Admin Post Author wrote on 04/11/2013 at 08:11pm

Do you have to keep them happy so they don't riot or try to escape or something? :D

BR Supporter wrote on 04/11/2013 at 08:57pm

I'm not sure...a bunch more just escaped a few seconds ago. They have happiness but they never seem to be happy, even though I give them everything.

jdodson Admin Post Author wrote on 04/11/2013 at 09:16pm

WHY ARE YOU NO HAPPY IN PRISON I GIVE U TV AND FOODS?

If you want to join this conversation you need to sign in.

Another Look At a Unique F2P MMO

Age of Empires Online came to Steam a bit ago and after that really hasn't received as much attention as it should. Its a shame really because its a unique take on the traditional MMO. Its a free to play game available in Steam, so if you haven't checked it out yet, I recommend you do. I reviewed it a bit ago and you can check that out here:

http://cheerfulghost.com/jdodson/posts/557

One glaring problem of Age of Empires is how hard it is to install. After you install it in Steam, it requires you to create a Microsoft Live account and obtain an install key to plug in to Age of Empires Online. Creating a Microsoft Live account is trivial, getting the Age of Empires... Read All

Evoland

Evoland (Shiro Games) is currently in my list of games that I must get everyone to play. Especially if you are one of the 20 to 30 something year olds that grew up with gaming.

Reminding me somewhat of DLC Quest, Evoland is a game that builds up from just the basics. You start out in a world that reminds me of an old Gameboy, unlocking chests to upgrade everything around you. The first thing you unlock is directional movement and it continues from there. In Evoland, you unlock just about everything, from game scrolling to color and sound (eventually HD 3D graphics and 16-bit music) and in doing so it pays homage to quite a few different games, including The Legend of... Read All Evoland (Shiro Games) is currently in my list of games that I must get everyone to play. Especially if you are one of the 20 to 30 something year olds that grew up with gaming.

Reminding me somewhat of DLC Quest, Evoland is a game that builds up from just the basics. You start out in a world that reminds me of an old Gameboy, unlocking chests to upgrade everything around you. The first thing you unlock is directional movement and it continues from there. In Evoland, you unlock just about everything, from game scrolling to color and sound (eventually HD 3D graphics and 16-bit music) and in doing so it pays homage to quite a few different games, including The Legend of Zelda , Final Fantasy and Diablo. If you played any of these games, you're sure to catch some of the references.

The story line is simple and sweet, echoing games where you are the one hero that can save the world. You do so with 3 weapons (a sword, bombs, and eventually a bow), all of which aren't always available. As you explore the world, you'll come across several puzzles which reward you wish chests. The chests include game upgrades, stars, or cards, all of which you can collect for special achievements. Keep in mind, this game isn't always easy. And you should expect to die (especially until you unlock save points) and at times, you'll get overwhelmed. The end boss fight can take several times to master but the mechanics are simple enough that you'll learn them within a few attempts.

The game play was surprisingly smooth, feeling like I was literally back in one of the old console games with stop/hit motions. The controls were stupidly simple and easy to learn, in a way that you could focus completely on the game play and beautiful graphics, rather than worrying about what keys to press and when.

The game is a little on the short side and I would have loved to see a longer more drawn out story. It only took me about 5 hours from start to finish, including having to backtrack once because I got lost (you also have to unlock your minimap!)

If you don't enjoy turn based RPGs, then there are several points where you will get frustrated with this game. There are quite a few zones that have "Surprise!" turn style combat. I personally, don't like that sort of game play and found myself running away more often than not.

I wouldn't recommend this game if you don't have any gaming roots that link back to the aforementioned games or 80s and 90s gaming in general, but if you have played these games, the nostalgia is great and this is definitely worth the play through. But keep in mind, this game isn't overly long. It took me about 5 hours from start to finish, so if the price to game time ratio is a deal breaker, wait for it to go on sale, but this is a game you have to try.

Nick_Donahoo wrote on 04/07/2013 at 10:39pm

I'm loving the recent surge of old-school gaming. I may have to give this a try.

jdodson Admin wrote on 04/07/2013 at 11:20pm

This sounds pretty awesome an I plan on nabbing this when I see it on sale or am looking to play something new!

Thanks for putting this on my radar!

Travis Admin wrote on 04/08/2013 at 12:54am

This one has been on my radar since I first heard about it. I didn't play it until the past two or three days though, battling the flu this week put a damper on everything.

Evoland had almost equal parts awesome fan service, and really disappointing/annoying mechanics. It's definitely something I'd put in the "recommend" column, for sure, but there were times I wanted to stop because I was frustrated or just plain bored.

CapnCurry Supporter wrote on 04/08/2013 at 05:31pm

I've looked at this one a few times, but the "short story" piece was a bit of a warning flag. 4-5 hours of gameplay I can definitely part with ten bucks for, though; I was worried it was more "DLC-quest" sized. Shopping spree: engage!

If you want to join this conversation you need to sign in.

Princesses Don't Need Saving Anymore

Once upon a time, games were simple. Bad guys did bad things. Princesses got kidnapped. Heroes saved the day.

This was perfectly fine. When movies were first being made, plots were rarely more complicated than Big Angry Monster + Frightened Villagers = Dead Monster. The concept was so novel that by merely being a motion picture, it blew people's minds. The same is true of video games, or pretty much any other medium. Once the novelty runs off, any medium has to either innovate fall to the wayside.

As pixels gave way to polygons, stories had to evolve with them. Stories had to become more complex, because 'Rescue the Princess' just didn't cut it anymore. We came to... Read All Once upon a time, games were simple. Bad guys did bad things. Princesses got kidnapped. Heroes saved the day.

This was perfectly fine. When movies were first being made, plots were rarely more complicated than Big Angry Monster + Frightened Villagers = Dead Monster. The concept was so novel that by merely being a motion picture, it blew people's minds. The same is true of video games, or pretty much any other medium. Once the novelty runs off, any medium has to either innovate fall to the wayside.

As pixels gave way to polygons, stories had to evolve with them. Stories had to become more complex, because 'Rescue the Princess' just didn't cut it anymore. We came to expect epic quests and ancient evils. Games became a way to escape. Stories became more important, but often still relied on tried and true tropes. We always knew that the damsel would be in distress, the valiant hero would save the day, and evil would be banished for a few thousand more years.

As graphical capabilities have edged closer and closer to lifelike, so have the stories. With our latest generation of game consoles, we are seeing a firm grounding in reality with many stories. Even stories that are firmly planted in fantasy strive for a 'human' feel. Games like Heavy Rain took away monsters and magic, and made the monsters decidedly human.

As I started this latest iteration of Tomb Raider, I will admit my hopes were not the highest. Having been disappointed by many games in the series before (Tomb Raider: Underworld, anyone?), I was a little hesitant. After all, Tomb Raider had never been known for it's stellar storytelling or rich back story. For the most part, there were two defining features of the series, and they both likely are the cause of Lady Croft's lower back problems. A series of glowing reviews convinced me to give it a shot, regardless.

I had been prompted to play this game after completing Bioshock: Infinite. I found myself in search of a similar experience, namely looking to strike an emotional chord with protecting a young woman. Having grown up with 'Save The Princess' games, I guess the urge to save the 'damsel in distress' has always been ingrained in me. Every trailer I had seen made a specific point of how this game chronicles the humble beginnings of Lara Croft, before the bravado and confidence we see in previous entries. In other words, we are looking at a person, and not a character.

It didn't take me long to realize that this was a girl that did not need protecting. I found Lara at one point bound, defenseless, and surrounded by angry men with guns. Most games would make this the moment where a boyfriend or father figure comes in, guns blazing, and saves the day. The men captured with her are swiftly dispatched, and it does not take long to realize that no help is coming. If this damsel remained in distress, simply dying would be a mercy.

I go on to see a young woman get stabbed, shot at, attacked by animals, and at one point, beaten by no less than four angry Russians. I found myself changing along with the girl on the screen. I felt helpless scrambling for daylight in a dark cave. I was terrified fending off wolves in the middle of a storm. The sorrow and regret was palpable when I had to take down a deer to keep from starving. After one tragedy too many, I was actually a bit surprised to find myself getting cocky when I overheard two guards saying "What's the problem? She's just one little girl!" "Yeah, well, this girl is kicking our asses!" Those angry Russians that beat on Lara? I didn't find myself worrying if she was okay. I knew she was. Instead, I found myself looking for them as the game went on, making sure they paid for their brutality.

As I watched the credits roll, I knew that I wasn't looking at a girl any more. This was a woman, strong and capable. This princess would never need a knight in shining armor to come rescue her. I fear for the dragon that thinks he can keep her locked up.

Blue_Element wrote on 04/07/2013 at 12:05am

That was amazing. :)

AdamPFarnsworth wrote on 04/07/2013 at 02:41pm

Great writing! I've been interested in this game since before it came out and you might have just caused another purchase.

jdodson Admin wrote on 04/07/2013 at 05:14pm

Thanks for writing this Nick, I appreciate it. I have never considered getting a Tomb Raider... until now :D

Nick_Donahoo Post Author wrote on 04/07/2013 at 07:23pm

By and large, I've avoided the series, because, well, they seemed campy and unrealistic. While there is a certain amount of a supernatural element to the game, which is par for the course, it didn't really beat you over the head with it like some of the older ones. There has been a running joke about how when Uncharted came out, it was essentially "Dude Raider". It's kind of funny, because this game feels like more of a spiritual successor to Nathan Drake than one of Lara Croft's adventures. That's a good thing though, as Uncharted was the main reason I bought my Playstation 3 (Well, that, and Metal Gear Solid 4). A decent story, voice acting that didn't make me cringe, and pretty innovative controls. Basically, a bunch of things I hadn't seen from a Tomb Raider game before.

Looks like if you're a PC gamer, Amazon has it for $15 off right now. I'm happy paying $50 for it used on PS3. $35 is a hell of a deal.

If you want to join this conversation you need to sign in.

Int. -w Creators of The New Handheld GCW Zero

I have a desire to own a well made gameboy styled handheld that I can do with what I wish. After searching for a bit about what was available the recently Kickstarted GCW Zero caught my attention. As such I asked them if they would answer a few of my questions about it and the retro community that surrounds its potential awesomeness.

jdodson: For you, what is the coolest thing the GCW Zero does?

GCW Zero: It allows people to do things for free gaming wise they would normally have to pay more then they can Afford and if a cost is involved it is so low it won't hit you in the bank where it hurts most.

jdodson: I find that touch games just don’t draw me in when compared to... Read All

Witcher 3 is DRM-free.

In the days of everything having issues with just about everything having some sort of DRM, the Devs of Witcher 3 (CD Projekt RED) have announced that they will not be going the DRM route with their up and coming title.

They have stated that, "We are trying to get rid of DRM. If someone wants to pirate a game, eventually he will.”

I don't really have a problem with DRM, since I purchase and play most of my PC titles through Steam. I do however, have a problem with DRM becomes a hindered by it and lessens my gaming experience. (Most notably, EA with requiring Origin, as my computer seems to hate it).

Full (very short) article can be found here: ... Read All

Starcrafts Season 2 Starts April 27th

Starcrafts Season 2 will begin April 27th and each episode will drop on Saturdays. Looking forward to the new season and since I dig zerg, the new focus should be awesome :D

Always Online & Trust in The New Gaming Landscape

Some rumors surfaced that the next console by Microsoft would require you to be "always online" to use it. Kotaku started things off with the first "insider source leak."

http://kotaku.com/the-next-xbox-will-require-an-internet-connection-to-st-470062456

When I heard the news I wasn't really surprised. After the news broke a Microsoft Studio rep exchanged tweets with a few people that were not received well. Telling people to "just deal with it" over the always online requirement apparently didn't go over well with folks.

http://metro.co.uk/2013/04/05/microsoft-response-to-always-online-xbox-rumours-is-dealwithit-3584410/

The rep Tweeted:

"Sorry, I don’t get the drama... Read All

CapnCurry Supporter wrote on 04/06/2013 at 03:35am

The "always online" motif makes me nervous for many of the same reasons it does you. City of Heroes was a fun game that never found its niche and was shut down for good; that's one game experience I'll never be able to share with the next generation. It's not going to be profitable for EA to support Sim City 5 forever. Hell, the original Neverwinter Nights on AOL was a tremendously fun game that I never got the chance to really explore - and never will.

This is not to say that the ability to keep games and experiences alive forever should be the cornerstone of what makes a game acceptable. But it does seem like we need to cast a more careful eye to figuring out whether we're buying our games or merely renting them.

jdodson Admin Post Author wrote on 04/06/2013 at 03:42am

I think thats a really awesome point. I think its quite sad to consider that some stuff won't be usable simply because it becomes economically unfeasible to modernize it.

Culture lost.

scrypt Supporter wrote on 04/06/2013 at 06:11pm

Microsoft won me back with the original Xbox, and initially I thought the 360 was a step in the right direction. Now, I hate my 360. It's cumbersome and littered with advertisements. It's turning (has turned) into the MySpace of gaming experiences. If they really do go with the always-on approach, then I'll skip this next iteration. There is no reason for that kind of system, other than greed and control. It serves no other purpose. It makes me a little sad that there will be exclusives to such a system that I might not otherwise play, but I can get over that. There is a mountain of great games on GOG and Steam that I haven't even touched yet.

hardeyez wrote on 04/07/2013 at 08:46pm

I also don't get why Microsoft thinks I should pay them $60/yr (per person, or if they still offer the Family Pack whatever that costs) just to use *my* internet connection. That is, without gold, I can't stream my Amazon Prime movies to my 360 (which I can to my ps3, wii u, pc, tablets, etc.) nor can I use their web browser... I mean really?!!??!

If you want to join this conversation you need to sign in.